Unfortunately in this case I cannot do that as there are many entries in the table already. Probably the unsigned int is enough for your client's requirements and it uses 4 bytes instead of 8 of the big int so the index would do it better in terms of cpu and memory. It seems it must've crashed in the middle of a row insert so the db thought the new id had already been used but really it hadn't. In this instance, empty values have been found in the key field column s. The stage table will have a segmented unique key. The error message will contain the first duplicated value that EasyCatalog found.
Cannot insert duplicate key in object. Is there anyway to edit the script to add the script for removing the index at top and then re-defining the index at bottom. The duplicate key value is 2999, C1234, 2018-12-13, 2018-12-14, 32999. Dropping all tables and reloading them from a backup. You are trying to create a unique index on a field with duplicates.
Now I know that I can delete all these and insert them into the error table and apply the index, but I don't want more coming in later. Does anyone have something like this? The duplicate key value is January. I'm currently looking at Query Store to try and isolate which operation was running against this specific table around the time the error occurred. Delete all your Addons — By removing all your add-ons can also solve and get back from this World of Warcraft Error 134 code problem. When loading data, EasyCatalog will check the contents of the key field columns to determine whether they contain unique values. I need specific directions on how to fix this thing in layman terms Jezer, 02-14-2011, Thanks so much for your help! I'm seeing this same problem occuring on a 5. I have an import table and a stored procedure to append to a stage table with the values from the import table.
My solution was to add the new column without making it unique; then entered the data for each code one row at a time; and then changing the column structure to make it unique for future entries. So, just repair the table and voila! I have posted a stripped down sample here. The error is occurring when I update a Drupal databse to the latest version. Hope these solutions will surely help you to get back from this Error code 134 issues. Also, the error message occurs sporatically, once a week or every couple of weeks in all three environments, and the environments are loaded independently not restored from production. I would say that the error message is citing the wrong index name, but the duplicate value combination doesn't appear to line up with the primary key or unique index either.
My co-worker, and thank goodness it's his last day today. This just requires a server restart. The index cited in the error is as originally posted, although I posted it with the wrong table name originally. It turns out the next value was exactly the one it was trying to insert, so I just increased this value by 1 and that solved the problem. We want to figure out why it is a duplicate. I am having master-master replication setup.
Please mark as helpful if you found this post was helpful. Apparently the id got defined as a sequence: Each failed insert increases the pointer in the sequence till it increments to a value that no longer exists and the queries succeed. Occasionally Excel will export empty rows and columns after the data, and creating a new sheet usually fixes this. I'll ask my database admin to rebuild the table as you described. This error problem occurs when you run the client.
That might be the case, but for non-unique non-clustered indexes, I would think the uniquifier would be the actual row id coming from the table. You cannot have both the record as you table has a unique primary index. While I wait, I tried an example here which in a stored procedure compiled, but I don't know if my reasoning is sound. . Just any row that has a duplicate gets moved. Step 1 Create a backup of the database by issuing: The duplicate key entry happens when you reach the upper limit of the auto increment field, in your case, being a signed int the upper boundary is 2147483647.
Before I do any of this, I cannot create the unique key. Those may collide with the next value from the associated sequence. Sometimes the error is not caused by the table your trying to change, but the table your trigger is trying to change! You might also want to learn more about the. Hey, I know you are in trouble with World of Warcraft Error 134 WoW Code Problem. This is to enable it to uniquely identify each record in your source data so that if, for example, a record changes position in the data it can still be found. Once the last record is with the id 2147483647, when you insert a new record the id should be 2147483648.